|
GDSourcing's |
|
||
|
|
|
||
| Home | Search by Sector | Search by Subject | Advanced Search | Search by ID# | FREE TRIAL |
| About | Dead Links | Forgot Password | Help | SUBSCRIBE NOW | |
| ID #: | 3892 | |||||||||||||||
| Title: | This information available to subscribers only. For more information click here | |||||||||||||||
| Source: | ||||||||||||||||
| Description: | Percentage of households reporting a purchase and average expenditure per households on Home Security equipment. | |||||||||||||||
| Publication Date: | 12/17/2010 | |||||||||||||||
| Frequency: | Annual | |||||||||||||||
| Location Type: | Online | |||||||||||||||
| Geography: | Canada, provinces | |||||||||||||||
| Hyperlink 1: | This information available to subscribers only. For more information click here | |||||||||||||||
| Hyperlink 2: | ||||||||||||||||
| Location 1: | ||||||||||||||||
| Location 2: | ||||||||||||||||
| Notes: |
Data is only available at Location 1. There is a $6.00 charge from the source to access it. Click here for full data coverage including custom research analysis |
|||||||||||||||
| Posted/Updated: | 12/17/2010 | |||||||||||||||
| ID #: | 39269447 | |||||||||||||||
| Title: | This information available to subscribers only. For more information click here | |||||||||||||||
| Source: | ||||||||||||||||
| Description: |
Public opinion on airport security. Includes: From what you have seen, read or heard, do you support or oppose the use of airport
scanners to screen all passengers flying to and from Canada? Which of these methods would you prefer if you had to go through security at an airport tomorrow? (The airport scanner that produces a three-dimensional outline of your body, The pat-down method, with an officer running his or her hands along your outer garments to detect any concealed items) Results by age group, gender, province. [terrorism, security equipment] |
|||||||||||||||
| Publication Date: | 1/7/2010 | |||||||||||||||
| Frequency: | ||||||||||||||||
| Location Type: | Online | |||||||||||||||
| Geography: | Canada, provinces | |||||||||||||||
| Hyperlink 1: | This information available to subscribers only. For more information click here | |||||||||||||||
| Hyperlink 2: | ||||||||||||||||
| Location 1: | ||||||||||||||||
| Location 2: | ||||||||||||||||
| Notes: | ||||||||||||||||
| Posted/Updated: | 1/26/2010 | |||||||||||||||
| ID #: | 39266359 | |||||||||||||||
| Title: | This information available to subscribers only. For more information click here | |||||||||||||||
| Source: | ||||||||||||||||
| Description: |
Public opinion on the use of surveillance cameras. Includes: Overall, do you think the use of security cameras is necessary to prevent and solve crime? % agree: Mass transit systems like the TTC require special security measures, and the use of surveillance cameras in this case is justified, Other Canadian cities should follow the TTC’s example and invest in surveillance cameras for their own transportation systems % agree: The TTC’s purchase of surveillance cameras sets a negative precedent in Canada, because it encourages the breach of individual privacy in the name of security, The TTC’s plan to install 10,000 surveillance cameras is too expensive and will not necessarily lead to a reduction in criminal activity. Would you support or oppose the use of surveillance cameras for security purposes in your municipality's public transportation system? Would you support or oppose the use of surveillance cameras for security purposes in your municipality's public spaces? % agree: On the topic of surveillance cameras, the need for safety trumps individual privacy rights. Results by province, gender and age group. [security equipment] |
|||||||||||||||
| Publication Date: | 3/12/2008 | |||||||||||||||
| Frequency: | ||||||||||||||||
| Location Type: | Online | |||||||||||||||
| Geography: | Canada, provinces | |||||||||||||||
| Hyperlink 1: | This information available to subscribers only. For more information click here | |||||||||||||||
| Hyperlink 2: | ||||||||||||||||
| Location 1: | ||||||||||||||||
| Location 2: | ||||||||||||||||
| Notes: | ||||||||||||||||
| Posted/Updated: | 4/14/2008 | |||||||||||||||
| ID #: | 39265277 | |||||||||||||||
| Title: | This information available to subscribers only. For more information click here | |||||||||||||||
| Source: | ||||||||||||||||
| Description: |
Estimated total losses incurred by retailers in Quebec (2007), % attributed to Theft and fraud by employees, Shoplifting and consumer fraud, Administrative errors and supplier fraud or errors % of Quebec retailers offer their customers the possibility to purchase goods through their Internet site, % of these have been victims of cyber fraud Human prevention measures used by retailers - % report employee training/awareness, bag checks, "mystery" shoppers and Control or monitoring of the receipt of merchandise Physical measure used. % report Safes, Visible simulated closed-circuit systems, Cables, locks, chains Electronics measures used: Traditional alarm systems, Closed-circuit cameras, Anti-theft tags, Security devices for merchandise displays. [Security equipment] Security intentions over the next 12 months. % of retailers believe the number of incidences has increased in 2007, Average value of goods lost through shoplifting. |
|||||||||||||||
| Publication Date: | 10/23/2007 | |||||||||||||||
| Frequency: | ||||||||||||||||
| Location Type: | Online | |||||||||||||||
| Geography: | Quebec | |||||||||||||||
| Hyperlink 1: | This information available to subscribers only. For more information click here | |||||||||||||||
| Hyperlink 2: | ||||||||||||||||
| Location 1: | ||||||||||||||||
| Location 2: | ||||||||||||||||
| Notes: | ||||||||||||||||
| Posted/Updated: | 10/25/2007 | |||||||||||||||
| ID #: | 39263457 | |||||||||||||||
| Title: | This information available to subscribers only. For more information click here | |||||||||||||||
| Source: | ||||||||||||||||
| Description: |
This report examines the various crime prevention measures employed by Canadians and the factors associated with their use. Includes: % of individuals using lifetime protective measures 1999 & 2004 (Changed activities or avoided certain places, Installed burglar alarms or motion detectors [security equipment], Installed new locks or security bars, Took a self-defence course, Obtained a dog, Changed phone number, Changed residence or moved, Obtained a gun) % of individuals using routine precautionary measures (1999 & 2004) (Lock car doors for safety when alone, Check back seat for intruders when returning to car alone, Plan route with safety in mind, Carry something to defend self or alert others, Stay home at night because afraid to go out alone) Crime prevention measures taken to protect self or property by personal characteristics, 2004 (gender, age group, marital status, education, income, immigrant status, visible minority, Aboriginal, victimization in the previous 12 months, number of evening activities) Crime prevention measures taken to protect self or property by household characteristics, 2004 (size of household, urban/rural, length of residence, owned/rent, dwelling type) % using crime prevention measures by perception of community safety. |
|||||||||||||||
| Publication Date: | 11/23/2006 | |||||||||||||||
| Frequency: | ||||||||||||||||
| Location Type: | Online | |||||||||||||||
| Geography: | Canada | |||||||||||||||
| Hyperlink 1: | This information available to subscribers only. For more information click here | |||||||||||||||
| Hyperlink 2: | ||||||||||||||||
| Location 1: | ||||||||||||||||
| Location 2: | ||||||||||||||||
| Notes: | ||||||||||||||||
| Posted/Updated: | 11/23/2006 | |||||||||||||||